D argue that it does not push for enough affordable housing to ease the city’s crisis. E additionally requires that they are “skilled and trained,” a condition likely to favor union workers.Ĭritics of Prop. D requires that workers are paid a “prevailing wage” and are afforded health and educational benefits, Prop. D, and requires that construction begins within 24 months of a project’s approval. It retains environmental reviews, which are waived in Prop. E, which is backed by the Board of Supervisors, the building trades, and the firefighters and teachers unions, is similar, but has a higher threshold for how many affordable units are required. It would also remove the requirement that the Board of Supervisors approve affordable housing projects that use city resources, and would allow some pricier housing to be streamlined. Scott Wiener, and a slew of tech money, would shorten the deadline for certain types of housing projects to be approved specifically, those with 100-percent affordable units, those with 15 percent extra below-market-rate units than is already required by the city, and those reserved for teachers. D, which is backed by Mayor London Breed, Sen. Despite their similarities, these dueling propositions have sparked fierce political debate and a raft of conflicting donations. OL24848329W Page_number_confidence 92.63 Pages 382 Partner Innodata Pdf_module_version 0.0.15 Ppi 360 Rcs_key 24143 Republisher_date 20210818153336 Republisher_operator Republisher_time 412 Scandate 20210818002313 Scanner Scanningcenter cebu Scribe3_search_catalog isbn Scribe3_search_id 9780985661908 Tts_version 4.Propositions D and E ostensibly have an identical goal: increasing affordable housing in San Francisco by offering an expedited building track for developers. Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 10:05:35 Boxid IA40220017 Camera Sony Alpha-A6300 (Control) Collection_set printdisabled External-identifier

Don Prophet by Erik Simon